The use of armed drones presents a number of legal, ethical and global peace and security challenges that make their increasing deployment a pressing cause for concern. With their long endurance, armed capabilities, low costs and the lack of physical risk to their operators during use, armed drones have distinct characteristics in comparison to other platforms. These functions lower the threshold for lethal force and have enabled their use in counterterrorism operations that are challenging international legal frameworks. Armed drones have significantly expanded the practice of extrajudicial/targeted killing by certain states over the past decade.
Their use has resulted in a significant number of civilian casualties, despite claims of ‘precision’. Drone strikes have fostered resentment and can engender support for armed groups. The continuous threat of armed drones has been demonstrated to lead to severe psychological impacts on communities. Governments using armed drones have also refused to provide transparency regarding drone strikes. This secrecy undermines accountability, which deprives the victims of drone strikes of their right to an effective remedy.
Membership of EFAD is open to European non-government organisations who:
– Undertake work on the issue of armed drones,
– have ratified EFAD’s Call to Action document, and
– are approved as members by the current membership.
Members are actively encouraged to engage with our domestic and international advocacy and research. For more information on joining EFAD, please contact us.